My vet started him on an antibiotic called Clavamox, but it continues to be swollen and it still drains a bit despite the medication and warm compresses being applied daily.
They then told me that they should place a drain in the area surgically, and now they are thinking they should remove the gland. Don’t dogs need their glands? Surely they are there for a reason and serve some purpose.
Should I proceed with the surgery, and which route should they pursue? Thanks.
- M.M.
Dear M.M.,
Usually a course of antibiotics will suffice in treating an anal gland abscess, but in some cases the infection may persist.
I often give clients the option of placing a surgical drain as well as using antibiotics at the start of treatment rather than simply using antibiotics alone.
It is not unusual to need to be more aggressive with removal of the gland if the problem persists.
I do not think that assessment can be properly made until the surgeon actually incises the area. Removal of the gland may well be in order and prevent any recurrence of problems later. Dogs do not need their anal glands at all. The purpose is not clear other than providing some lubrication and providing a scent for marking when defecating or being sniffed by another dog.
In conclusion, trust your veterinarian to proceed as needed and do not worry.
Besides, the dog always has the other gland so he can still provide his own scent.
No comments:
Post a Comment